첫째, 님은 도킨스가 표현하고있는 'selfish (이기성) 이란 뜻을 잘못 이해하고 있어요....
다시... 도킨스가 selfish gene 책에 쓴, 그의 말을 여기에 올리죠....
" It is important to realize that the above definitions of ALTRUISM and SELFISHNESS
are behavioural, not subjective. I am not concerned here with the psychology of motives.
I am not going to argue about whether people who behave altruistically are REALLY doing
it for secret or subconscious selfish motives. Maybe they ARE and maybe they AREN'T,
and maybe we can NEVER know, but in any case that is NOT what this book is about."
위 문장 이해 하시죠 ?
도킨스가 주장하지도 않는 이론을..... 엉터리로 해석했어...그가 주장하는것처럼 쓰놓고 거기에
대한 반례를 올려달라고 하니....원.
이 Selfish Gene 책에서 도킨스가 주장하고 있는것이 무엇인지....주제가 무엇인지 이해를 못하시는것
같아요.....번역이 잘 못 된 책을 읽어셨나...?????? ㅋㅋㅋ....
그러니깐 서리.....이 사람의 주장은......
" The GENE is the principal unit of selection in EVOLUTION and the result of a simple blind
random process by natural selection. "
아시겠어요 ???
" 인간은 유전자의 보전을 위해서만 행동하지 않습니다 "
언제...도킨스가 인간은 유전자의 보전을 위해서만 행동을 한다고 했나요 ?
위에...도킨스가 뭐라고 말했는지 다시 한번 읽어보세요.
도킨스의 진화론 주장에 어떻게 생각하는가 ? 하고 본문의 주제가 되야하지 않나요?
저는...도킨스의 진화론을 맹목적으로 추종하는 사람이 아니예요.
개인적으로...
I think that the Organisms are using the Genes to reproduce themselves....
and Organisms are more important than Gene......
Everybody knows that Genes don't have conscious personalities or intelligence......
They just have an instinct to strike and eat, they don't understand how they do it
or how it works,.....they just do it....
So...they couldn't have been responsible for developing the organisms....
Whether we are talking about cells, molecules, or atoms.......
For them to form complex organs such as the BRAIN that can move, speak, think, feel,
dream, imagine, create, learn........and on and on and on.........literally.
they have to have a higher form of intelligence and be able to comprehend and think.......
But.....THEY CANNOT !!!
Therefore.......Dawkins' Gene centric evolution theory makes NO sense !!! ^.^
첫째, 님은 도킨스가 표현하고있는 'selfish (이기성) 이란 뜻을 잘못 이해하고 있어요....
다시... 도킨스가 selfish gene 책에 쓴, 그의 말을 여기에 올리죠....
" It is important to realize that the above definitions of ALTRUISM and SELFISHNESS
are behavioural, not subjective. I am not concerned here with the psychology of motives.
I am not going to argue about whether people who behave altruistically are REALLY doing
it for secret or subconscious selfish motives. Maybe they ARE and maybe they AREN'T,
and maybe we can NEVER know, but in any case that is NOT what this book is about."
위 문장 이해 하시죠 ?
도킨스가 주장하지도 않는 이론을..... 엉터리로 해석했어...그가 주장하는것처럼 쓰놓고 거기에
대한 반례를 올려달라고 하니....원.
이 Selfish Gene 책에서 도킨스가 주장하고 있는것이 무엇인지....주제가 무엇인지 이해를 못하시는것
같아요.....번역이 잘 못 된 책을 읽어셨나...?????? ㅋㅋㅋ....
그러니깐 서리.....이 사람의 주장은......
" The GENE is the principal unit of selection in EVOLUTION and the result of a simple blind
random process by natural selection. "
아시겠어요 ???
" 인간은 유전자의 보전을 위해서만 행동하지 않습니다 "
언제...도킨스가 인간은 유전자의 보전을 위해서만 행동을 한다고 했나요 ?
위에...도킨스가 뭐라고 말했는지 다시 한번 읽어보세요.
도킨스의 진화론 주장에 어떻게 생각하는가 ? 하고 본문의 주제가 되야하지 않나요?
저는...도킨스의 진화론을 맹목적으로 추종하는 사람이 아니예요.
개인적으로...
I think that the Organisms are using the Genes to reproduce themselves....
and Organisms are more important than Gene......
Everybody knows that Genes don't have conscious personalities or intelligence......
They just have an instinct to strike and eat, they don't understand how they do it
or how it works,.....they just do it....
So...they couldn't have been responsible for developing the organisms....
Whether we are talking about cells, molecules, or atoms.......
For them to form complex organs such as the BRAIN that can move, speak, think, feel,
dream, imagine, create, learn........and on and on and on.........literally.
they have to have a higher form of intelligence and be able to comprehend and think.......
But.....THEY CANNOT !!!
Therefore.......Dawkins' Gene centric evolution theory makes NO sense !!! ^.^